The "rocky treatment course": identifying a high-risk subgroup of head and neck cancer patients for supportive interventions

Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):719-727. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3450-5. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

Abstract

Purpose: We aim to identify the risk factors for a "rocky" treatment course (RTC) in head and neck cancer.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted utilizing data from a prospective study. We defined the RTC as a composite of adverse outcomes including G-tube dependence and increased nursing interventions. Statistically associative variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression. We also evaluated whether the RTC, or its components, associated with worse cancer outcomes.

Results: Being single, unemployed, having N2/3 disease and receiving chemoradiotherapy were associated with a RTC. In turn, G-tube dependence was associated with worse 3-year OS (73 vs 91 %; p = 0.02) and increased nursing interventions with worse 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (85 vs 92 %; p = 0.03) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) (14 vs 7 %; p = 0.03).

Conclusions: We identified baseline factors associated with a RTC for head and neck cancer patients. Future supportive care interventions could be evaluated using the RTC as a marker of benefit.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; Radiotherapy; Supportive interventions.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / therapy*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neck Dissection
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / therapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult